Club Admiralty

v7.0 - moving along, a point increase at a time

Club Admiralty Blog

A blog about life in general, in as many languages as I can manage. Ενα ιστολόγιο περι ζωής, πολυγλωσσο - σε όσες γλωσσες εχω μεράκι να γράψω.

Time Machine (Mouse Trap Style!)

OK, so they skipped some events, but this is still quite an amazing contraption!

Stacks Image 18

The evolution of an MBA

I think this video is an attempt at humor. It wasn't bad; the student reminded me of Michael Scott from the american version of the office at the end. Maybe It's my aversion to the corporate element and the suit ;-)

Stacks Image 18

Jersey Shore gone Wilde

I am not sure that "meta" is the correct term here, but "how meta!", also quite funny! (and I have not read any Oscar Wilde, and neither have I watched Jersey Shore.

Stacks Image 18

Super Mario Crossover!

This is a good find: Play Super Mario Brothers with your favorite character from Legend of Zelda, Metroid, Mega Man, Simon Belmont or that guy from Contra :-)

Now of course some things just don't work like Samus' blaster  is kinda pathetic in the Mario World, and some things word great (like the Contra guy's gun).  It's a nice little NES nostalgia mashup for those of us who grew up with it :-)

Click here to play Crossover.

Stacks Image 18

Splinter Cell: Conviction - some thoughts [spoilers]


Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell ConvictionIt's been a couple of weeks since I completed the single player missions on Splinter Cell: Conviction (I guess I have to find someone to do co-op missions with now, lol).   My overall impression of the game is fairly positive.  I really liked the game play, it was reminiscent of previous Splinter Cell games, but it did manage to push the envelope a tad bit further (in a good way).  The story line was pretty good, although in many points in the game the story reminded me of 24 and Sam Fisher just reminded me of Jack Bauer.  This would be the only critique that I have of the game.

The story was nicely told though, and it did have a happy ending.  As someone who missed Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow and Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory I didn't really get the whole "my kid's dead" drama - but I am happy for this fictitious character that his family's OK. The storytellers are Ubisoft really did drag it out. Was Sarah (the daughter) alive? Or was it a ploy? Was she a live, or were they straining Sam along?

Now I didn't manage to rack up a lot of achievements - I guess I'll have to go back and play some more. It was enjoyable enough to go back for a second pass. I also didn't play Deniable Ops that much, but again, what I did play was quite enjoyable.  The story, this time around, didn't leave it at a cliffhanger, which Splinter Cell: Double Agent did; this made the ending much more satisfying. It did leave an opening for future Splinter Cell games, ones which I would gladly play :-)  Now if only Splinter Cell Classics were available on the xbox, I'd love to go back and play the series in its totality.

Now off to continue playing Assassin's Creed Brotherhood.
Stacks Image 18, what a missed opportunity!

Thanks to the wonders of Hulu and Netflix I was recently able to finish watching the entire series or Sliders.  Back when I was in high school I really liked the series, which originally aired on Fox, but, like many other shows, it was cancelled and later moved to a cable network - and I didn't have cable. I really wanted to find out what happened to the gang after all these years so I started watching with from the beginning.  I know that there is Wikipedia, and I could have easily found out what happened, but what's the fun in that?

In any case, I started watching the series from the beginning and it was hard to contain my disappointment. This series was better (or at least seemed better) when I was a teenager.  The outdated technology was an easy pill to swallow, after all it's something we're used to seeing going back to older series, but what was problematic was the bad acting and the bad script writing...oh, and the story too!  The underlying premise is this: there are parallel worlds to ours (there is an actual physics theory that supports this as far as I know), and some genius college student built a machine that allows you to travel between dimensions. Then there was a snafu and this group of people couldn't get home, so they were sliding from dimension to dimension.  The premise is good, it's actually been explored before in other scifi shows like Stargate SG-1. The only problem (well other than the bad writing) was that there was no end game with this series!

Season 1 seemed to be mostly about the dimension of the week. This was interesting to tell you the truth, it had a Star Trek (original, TNG, Voyager) feel to it. Then the writers decided to introduce an overarching villain, the Cromags. OK, an overall story arch is good...but then they left the whole Cromag thing hanging while they explore some weird mighty-morphing-brain-stem-stealing general. This was a major fail.  Then two of the main characters are either killed or captured (and never to be seen again).  The final blow was when Quinn Malory, THE inventory of sliding technology (at least in "our" dimension) gets fused with another Quinn Malory who looks nothing like him (apparently the actor wanter to do something else in lieu of the show). In any case, the last season seemed like a lame duck. It grew on me, I can't deny that, but what do they do at the end? Remy (the last original slider) goes into the wormhole, presumably to his home world, but he might also be dead. Then the 3 other sliders are left hanging out there.

In the end, there is no closure in this series! It's like someone shot it to death (maybe around season 2), and just let it bleed out, with no purpose, and apparently no effort to resuscitate it and patch it up.  Since the trend sees to be to look at old franchises and remake them for today's audiences, this might be a good series to revive at some point this decade.  I'd really like for someone to tackle to topic of interdimensional travel little better than the writers of this series did.
Stacks Image 18

Professional Angst - the MLIS vs. the PhD

I haven't paid much attention to the library world in the past couple of weeks while I get acclimated to my new job, and while I've been playing around with various learning management systems (since we're moving from WebCT Vista to something else).  I came across a blog post in the ACRLog the other day but didn't have much of an opportunity to read it until now. Its title "Why all the fuss over PhD Academic Librarians" - I have to say that the topic piqued my interest!

Apparently an academic library director up in Canada gave a talk at a colloquium series and one of his points (it seemed like a rather minor point to me) was that going forward they would be hiring fewer librarians and more IT professionals and people with PhDs to do work in libraries.  You can watch the whole talk here if you'd like - and if you're interest in libraries I suggest you do :-)  I watched it, and to be quite honest I found nothing problematic about his talk.  After all, for quite some time I've been saying that, in an academic environment, the library and the IT group should just merge so that there is one organization that has an end-to-end view of the information acquisition and dissemination in a university (maybe this this a topic for another blog post).

It seems like my sentiment (and the speaker's sentiment) wasn't really well received in library land.  Librarians have written in saying that his comments marginalize librarians, and therefore women (seems to me like a Glenn Beck comment, but I'm willing to debate the issue).  There are people who've told him to shut up; this was quite an interesting post because it seems to be demonstrating  a tension between the "us" versus the "them".  The interesting this is that there are people out there that don't think you need an MLIS [Masters degree in Library Science] to become a librarian (I am one of them!) but unlike me it seems that there is a distinct push against PhDs "taking away jobs" destined for librarians.  Whaaaaaat? If anyone can be a librarian, then who cares what the letters after one's name are? There is come cognitive dissonance in this argument.

One of the things that I don't get  by some people's arguments that PhDs are not research experts, but librarians are (librarians with an MLIS degree that is) is that PhDs have to actually DO research in order to get their darned PhD.  They need to find books, articles, and sources on a broad topic, they need to see what work has been done in the are they are interested in (i.e. do research to find out this info), and once they DO this research to find out what areas may have gaps, they do MORE research to try to fill those gaps by doing original research, thus completing a dissertation, successfully defending it and thus getting a PhD.  Without all this research, you don't get a PhD. So I really don't get where MLIS librarians making this argument are coming from.  Sure, MLIS librarians have honed (hopefully) the skill of the reference interview which really gets to the heart of what a library user is asking for, something that a PhD student doesn't necessarily have because they are only looking for info for themselves, but this isn't a skill that you go to library school for.

In the end, as has been pointed out, this type of professional angst is not new to the library profession. Even though some MLIS librarians accept non-MLIS librarians, they are seen as librarians who are raised by wolves, not socialized into the field's professional norms. I take issue to that as it doesn't really complement the people who are good librarians but don't have the MLIS. It seems like a way to accept, but still keep a two-tier caste system in library land - a system of unequal power relations among professionals. It seems to me that certain MLIS librarians, perhaps feeling self-conscious about their skills, are trying to complete with other professionals in other fields instead of looking for synergies. Sometimes I feel like we're seeing a fight in kindergarten when one kid loses an argument and proceeds to call the other kid a poopy-head, or when certain people try to (unhealthily) compare themselves with others when I read some blog posts.

In the arguments and in the comments to blog posts, one of the common themes that comes up is that the information world is changing so rapidly but that library schools aren't keeping up with the demands of the world to produce librarians capable of handling the demands of this new information culture. This is quite true! Some programs no longer require a course in cataloging and classification, something that I consider a core staple of the library profession.  Even within the MLIS librarian world there is infighting and lots of finger pointing.  Here's a comment from one of the blogs

There are librarians I think should not be hired, and often they come from graduate programs where all of their coursework was online. They have minimal practical experience and sit through classes while watching TV, catching up on email, or surfing Facebook. If you want to defend our professional, lobby for changes in library/information graduate programs. Some of them are great, some of them are a joke. ALA-accreditation falls short. Why hire librarians if employers have to train them all over again? What skills do libraries need? Furthermore, what skills do librarians need to fulfill an institution’s mission?
I think that this person doesn't really know what he's talking about.  I think that the medium (eLearning) is inappropriately vilified here simply because a few schools don't have the "rigor" that other schools have (or think they have).  Yes, with eLearning you can study in your pijamas while sipping your favorite merlot, but that doesn't mean that you are losing anyting in the educational process.  If you do, it's not the medium's faulty but rather the instructors!  I've had some very successful eLearning experiences (and some pretty bad ones too!). It's important to distinguish between the medium and the instructor,

Some of these MLIS-critique also focuses on how some schools may not have the breadth and depth of courses that Simmons has (a big name in MLIS education).  I will grant you that Simmons does have an impressive amount of courses on a variety of topics and they are quite balanced in what they offer.  They do have problems though!  I know of people who loaded up on courses (4 grad courses per semester, plus work) just to whiz through and "get their union card".  These people didn't think about what courses they ought to take to be professionally successful and fill their knowledge gaps. They took whatever course was offered, even if they knew the subject matter, in order to be done as soon as possible.

Another problem is pedantry disguised as rigor. I've been told, from people who pursued MLIS degrees, that courses in reference feature sit down exams (sit down exams!) where learners are asked to name which references sources they would look for certain info, and to list the attributes of certain reference sources (think "this product is best used for A, B, C type of info"). Most of this information comes from books like Katz's Introduction to Reference Work volume I and volume II.  This is just pendantic.  It's nice to have some of this information available, but the best reference librarian doesn't really concern himself with all sources of information because his library is UNLIKELY to contain all of them.  The best reference librarian familiarizes himself with the resources available in his library, and is on the lookout to acquire sources of reference that would benefit the target library user demographic in their school or community.

Finally, to bring this discussion back to PhDs (or other professionals for that matter) versus the MLIS; a few months ago a dear colleague told me that I should pursue an MLIS because I'd make a great librarian.  It was an awesome compliment, but I fail to see why I need an MLIS to become a librarian.  If someone already had another Master's degree and showed the requisite ability to do research, what would the MLIS provide for them - other than the union card? Many librarian colleagues have already said in public that the MLIS is just a union card.  Given that professional librarians with an MLIS are saying, openly and publicly, that the MLIS is just a union card, just something to get your foot in the door, and given that many MLIS librarians say that library schools aren't keeping up with their education, why is there such resistance to hiring outside the MLIS degree?  Why such animosity toward PhDs?  I sense some cognitive dissonance in the works :-)

wow, this was a long blog post - I promise not to write this much for a while LOL
Stacks Image 18

Half-Made World, some thoughts.

The Half-Made WorldLast fall I won a pre-release copy of the book Half-Made World by Felix Gilman - this was through Sadly with all the homework and school reading I didn't really get to read the book right away.  Well, with school over I was able to finally pick up the book and read it. I thought that since I do not read a lot of fiction it would be a good change of pace for my reading habits.

The book was quite interesting, it takes place in a Wild West type of environment but there is an element of steampunk and of spirits that inhabit or control the human body. I could really imagine this as a manga book in the same style as Priest.  The story was good and entertaining. around the half-way mark the book did lose some steam (no pun intended), but it kept going, it wasn't a catastrophic failure. [Spoiler alert] My only problem with the book was that there was no satisfactory end. We have no idea what really happened to any of the three main characters, or what the secret was, and we have a couple new characters introduced in the last chapter as if there is going to be a sequel (but I haven't seen any news of a sequel yet)

All this considered, reading this book was not a waste of time. I gave i a 4/5.

Stacks Image 18


 Mar 2021
 Feb 2021
 Jan 2021
 Dec 2020
 Nov 2020
 Oct 2020
 Sep 2020
 Aug 2020
 Jul 2020
 Jun 2020
 May 2020
 Apr 2020
 Mar 2020
 Feb 2020
 Jan 2020
 Dec 2019
 Nov 2019
 Oct 2019
 Sep 2019
 Aug 2019
 Jul 2019
 Jun 2019
 May 2019
 Apr 2019
 Mar 2019
 Feb 2019
 Jan 2019
 Dec 2018
 Nov 2018
 Sep 2018
 Jun 2018
 May 2018
 Apr 2018
 Mar 2018
 Feb 2018
 Jan 2018
 Dec 2017
 Nov 2017
 Oct 2017
 Sep 2017
 Aug 2017
 Jul 2017
 Jun 2017
 May 2017
 Apr 2017
 Mar 2017
 Feb 2017
 Jan 2017
 Dec 2016
 Nov 2016
 Oct 2016
 Sep 2016
 Aug 2016
 Jul 2016
 Jun 2016
 May 2016
 Apr 2016
 Mar 2016
 Feb 2016
 Jan 2016
 Dec 2015
 Nov 2015
 Oct 2015
 Sep 2015
 Aug 2015
 Jul 2015
 Jun 2015
 May 2015
 Apr 2015
 Mar 2015
 Feb 2015
 Jan 2015
 Dec 2014
 Nov 2014
 Oct 2014
 Sep 2014
 Aug 2014
 Jul 2014
 Jun 2014
 May 2014
 Apr 2014
 Mar 2014
 Feb 2014
 Jan 2014
 Dec 2013
 Nov 2013
 Oct 2013
 Sep 2013
 Aug 2013
 Jul 2013
 Jun 2013
 May 2013
 Apr 2013
 Mar 2013
 Feb 2013
 Jan 2013
 Dec 2012
 Nov 2012
 Oct 2012
 Sep 2012
 Aug 2012
 Jul 2012
 Jun 2012
 May 2012
 Apr 2012
 Mar 2012
 Feb 2012
 Jan 2012
 Dec 2011
 Nov 2011
 Oct 2011
 Sep 2011
 Aug 2011
 Jul 2011
 Jun 2011
 May 2011
 Apr 2011
 Mar 2011
 Feb 2011
 Jan 2011
 Dec 2010
 Nov 2010
 Oct 2010
 Sep 2010
 Aug 2010
 Jul 2010
 Jun 2010
 May 2010
 Apr 2010
 Mar 2010
 Feb 2010
 Jan 2010
 Dec 2009
 Nov 2009
 Oct 2009
 Sep 2009
 Aug 2009
 Jul 2009
 Jun 2009
 May 2009
 Apr 2009
 Mar 2009
 Feb 2009
 Jan 2009
 Dec 2008
 Nov 2008
 Oct 2008
 Sep 2008
 Aug 2008
 Jul 2008
 Jun 2008
 May 2008
 Apr 2008
 Mar 2008
 Feb 2008
 Jan 2008
 Dec 2007
 Nov 2007
 Oct 2007
 Sep 2007
 Aug 2007
 Jul 2007
 Jun 2007
 May 2007
 Apr 2007
 Mar 2007
 Feb 2007
 Jan 2007
 Dec 2006
 Nov 2006
 Oct 2006
 Sep 2006
 Aug 2006
 Jul 2006
 Jun 2006
 May 2006
 Apr 2006
 Mar 2006
 Feb 2006
 Jan 2006
 Dec 2005
 Nov 2005
 Oct 2005
 Sep 2005
 Aug 2005
 Jul 2005
 Jun 2005
 May 2005
 Feb 2005
 Dec 2004
 Nov 2004
 Sep 2004
 Aug 2004
 Jun 2004
 Apr 2004
 Mar 2004
 Feb 2004
 Jan 2004
 Jul 2003
 Oct 2000
 Jun 2000
 May 2000
 Mar 2000
Stacks Image 20